Morphic Resonance
In 1981 the book of R. Sheldrake was published, in which he put forward a hypothesis about morphic (form-building) fields. The reaction to the book turned out to be polar and very stormy, which contributed to its popularity. From that moment the idea that organisms of all beings acquire their complex anatomical structure not under the influence of only DNA, but also of an external agent carrying the memory of a biological species, has been widely circulated in society.
The idea of the role of fields in the formation of the embryo was expressed by A. Gurvich much earlier, back in 1920, but remained the lot of a narrow circle of specialists. Gurvich called this field morphogenetic, since it acted in the process of genesis. R. Sheldrake boldly extended the idea of a form-forming field to virtually all natural phenomena, and therefore suggested calling it morphic.
In addition to writing several books on the development of this subject, R. Sheldrake actively conducts his website on the Internet at www.sheldrake.org , where you can see the current state of his theory.
One of the important starting points of the worldview of R. Sheldrake is the idea of consciousness, even the consciousness of everything. He is convinced that the cosmos is filled with life in the sense that they are alive and endowed with the consciousness of the planet, planetary systems, galaxies and galactic clusters. Along with the rest, our planet Earth is also Gaia. The concept fully in this with him is solidary, with the proviso that the listed astronomical objects are only three-dimensional "skeletons" of conscious multi-dimensional beings.
Therefore, it is not surprising that the still popular cosmological model of the Big Bang is interpreted in the spirit of Eastern philosophy. Exactly: The universe was born from the revealed cosmic egg and is now growing. Thus, it should be looked at as a developing embryo rather than as a mechanical device.
The principle of development he extends to the laws of nature, governing the universe. And in fact, how can one talk about the immutable laws of nature applied to those times when no universe was yet? After all, the Big Bang theory proclaims that space and time arose together with the universe. Before its appearance there was no time, so there was no causality necessary for the existence of laws. To think otherwise would be equivalent to allowing the existence of eternal, unchanging Platonic ideas, whose shadows our world is supposed to be.
As is known, many scientists are inclined to "solve" the problem of the "anthropic principle" of the problem of an unlikely combination of the values of physical constants that admit the existence of biological life. They believe that for a mysterious reason, a lot of universes with different sets of constants (and, apparently, with different laws of nature) are constantly being born from the vacuum. Life originated in the rarest of them. So we see it.
To this approach, which is equivalent to the "cognitive impasse," according to the words of Tchaikovsky, R. Sheldrake opposes the idea that the laws of physics (like biology) are the result of the evolution of the universe. He proposes to abandon the term "law of nature" and replace it with the term "habit".
In support of this position, he cites data that even such a primitive process as the growth of crystals demonstrates the effects of "addiction." Thus, the formation of crystals of new, previously unknown chemicals, is happening the more successfully and the faster, the more often such experiments are repeated, which can not be explained from the point of view of official science. For substances that exist for billions of years, there is no variation in the rate of crystallization. Apparently, these chemical reactions have been repeated so many times that the "habit" of them has become similar to the law.
Note: R. Sheldrake's assumption that the whole universe is imbued with life and consciousness is very close to the Concept. However, it confines itself to considering only the three-dimensional "section" of the entire Universe, and by it only the physical universe is understood. But we, the inhabitants of the three-dimensional world, were here as a result of the Fall. By origin we are seven-dimensional. Here only three-dimensional "skeletons" of multidimensional beings are available for observation. Therefore, the physical planet Earth is the visible "skeleton" of the five-dimensional living being, which, indeed, is appropriate to call Gaia.
In the Universe, the process of formation of the Macrocosmos of new dimensions is carried out. The next step along this path takes place not earlier than in the previous Macrocosm, the state of Harmony will be achieved. It is inherited by the new Macrocosmos, but covers objects of only old dimensions. For the space of the new dimension and its beings, "pre-established harmony" is equivalent to the laws of nature
Therefore, the idea of R. Sheldrake that the laws of nature are essentially the result of her "habit" and are formed in the process of evolution, is absolutely correct.
So, the Universe is like a living organism, and what seems to be its laws is associated with stable patterns of behavior of the creatures inhabiting it. This applies even to mechanical processes. All nature is structured by fields, they bind and order the energy of the world. In addition to the known force fields, gravitational, etc., R. Sheldrake proposes to consider the form-forming fields, which he called morphic. He believes that they are as universal as the known physical fields. They are responsible for the uniformity of cosmic evolution, since all objects of one type are interconnected by fields and affect each other through morphic resonance. Such a resonance acts between similar objects regardless of distances and remoteness in time. "A universal network of morphic resonance among galaxies, stars and atoms is possible" ...
R. Sheldrake believes that the morphic fields have a kind of internal memory. They develop over time, because they themselves depend on the prehistory of the development of the form that is determined. This explains, in particular, the species stability of biological creatures, including humans.
He believes that when all form questions are linked to DNA, in which the genetic program of the organism, including its form, is supposed to be contained, then what is not attributed to DNA is attributed to it. It only controls the synthesis of proteins and nothing else! DNA is the same in all cells of the body. And the proteins are also the same. How then can DNA affect the shape of the body? After all, the house plan can not be contained in its bricks. So, DNA plays the role of just a resonator that connects the process of embryo development to that field that corresponds to this species. At the same time, the morphogenetic fields themselves are not inherited, they manifest themselves directly through morphic resonance.
An important argument in favor of this theory is the ability of organisms to heal their wounds. Moreover, with proper care, a part of the tree (seedling) grows into a whole tree. Parts of the worm grow into new worms.
Thus, the heredity of beings depends not only on genes. Genes define a set of proteins in the body, while the morphic fields determine the mutual organization of these proteins, the anatomy and behavior of the organism. Therefore, it should not be surprising that the human genome is not much different from the genome of the earthworm, which consists of similar proteins.
A growing organism is formed by a field that permeates it inside and surrounds it from the outside. It seems to contain the form of the organism. According to R. Sheldrake, this scheme is very close to the teachings of Aristotle about the soul, which is in all living things and sets the shape of the body. The body is contained in the soul, and not vice versa!
Note: As you can see, R.Shldrejka's theory is a list of properties that some desired object must satisfy to explain a large number of incomprehensible phenomena. The very term "field" helps him to keep within the accepted scientific paradigm, although on its very edge. All those properties of the morphic fields, which Sheldrake formulates, are easily found in thin microorganisms. The fact that the physical bodies of beings are surrounded by a glowing thin-material cocoon is unquestionable.
The effect of morphic fields outside time and space is explained by the fact that these fields are another name for the interaction of thin material structures with each other. Their space is primary in relation to the physical, and therefore their influence is carried out outside the framework of our space-time, and, as it were, without the expenditure of energy.
For the Concept, it is very important that Sheldrake's argument that in the process of ontogeny, DNA molecules play the role of only resonators that attract the carriers of the shaping impulse. The very DNA of information about the form and behavior of the future organism does not. The fertilized egg is the very same vacancy for the embodiment described in the Concept. But this is only her physical body. The main part of the vacancy is its thin material body, built of luminous fibers taken from the cocoons of the parents. This question is discussed in more detail in the next section.
R. Sheldrake believes that human memory is not stored inside the brain, as is commonly believed. Her organization has nothing to do with computer memory. This difference is especially noticeable due to the fact that the brain is extremely active at all times, day and night. This behavior is completely unrelated to the data warehouse. That should remain in peace until the moment of its replenishment or the appearance of a request to it.
In addition, the idea of a data warehouse is closely related to the problem of data recognition. If there is a request for the memory of something concrete, the memory should already know what is at stake. To do this, the main memory must have a sub memory. But before that there is also the problem of recognition, and so on ad infinitum.
Biologists have long been searching for traces of memory inside the brain, and these searches have not been crowned with success. Especially indicative are the experiments of K. Lashley with the removal of fragments of the brain in rats, trained to perform a certain trick beforehand. So, the rats continued to perform it, regardless of what brain tissue they had been removed from. Lashley himself and his student K. Pribram concluded from this that memory is distributed evenly throughout the brain, like a hologram. Sheldrake criticizes them for being so attached to the brain. In his opinion, traces of memory can not be found inside the brain simply because they are not there. It's like looking at the TV for the tracks of the programs that were viewed yesterday. The brain is more like a TV than a tape recorder. The brain is a device for setting up external morphic memory, and not its storage.
Due to the morphic resonance, such things affect similar things through space and time. The degree of influence depends on the degree of similarity. Since a person changes little, say, in five minutes, then his self-resonance stabilizes the morphic field and helps the body maintain its shape despite the fact that in every cell there is a mass of chemical processes. Similarly, due to self-resonance, habitual stereotypes of behavior are maintained.
Note: R. Sheldrake's idea that the brain is not a place of storage of memory, unfortunately, is not accompanied by an indication of the agent who replaces it in this respect. If we talk about the field seriously, it always plays the role of only a transmission link. It brings information from a source where it must somehow be stored.
The concept also shows that the brain is only the coordinating center of behavior. The world itself is in the memory of the world in its moments of the past . This memory is realized in the form of fine-material spatial structures of the microcosm, usually staying at rest. Their configuration took shape at the moment when a wave of energy passed through this part of the microcosm, with which our psyche connects its sense of "now". The effect of remembering arises when these structures are excited, than the presence of consciousness is modeled in the very moment of the past, which you need to remember.
The idea of morphine resonance is applicable not only to the growth of new crystals or to the development of living organisms, but also to the behavior of large groups of people. On its basis, the vitality and importance of traditions and rituals are easily explained. It helps to explain such phenomena as fashion, mass hypnosis and telepathy. According to Sheldrake, our brain is not only a "receiver", but also a "transmitter" of information, which remains in a kind of common pool even after the disappearance of the physical source.
The latter circumstance has found its unexpected confirmation on the example of blue tits, living in Holland. Since the 20-ies of the last century there is a tradition to leave the ordered milk on the porch of the house. So, the little cynics eventually learned to open these milk bottles and glue the cream. Then, in the trade in bottled milk, a seven-year break occurred, connected with the war. But as soon as the tradition was resumed, the tits of the whole Holland were engaged in milder piracy in a year. To appreciate this phenomenon, it should be noted that these birds live only three years and migrate for only three miles. Therefore, the war for them meant breaking the tradition for two generations at least. What helped them so quickly recover their skills on such a large territory?
At one time, R. Sheldrake predicted that the presence of the morphic field should facilitate the training of certain types of animals for animals of some kind, if a group of such animals has already mastered this skill. This effect must exist in addition to physical contacts between populations.
Sheldrake analyzed the old series of experiments on the training of rats, conducted in the 50's. The experiments began at Harvard, then continued in Scotland and in Australia. The accelerated learning of the rats found by him reached ten times! That is, the measured effect far exceeded the level of possible errors.
A natural continuation of what has been said is R. Sheldrake's assumption that there is a collective memory underlying everything we do and everything that we remember as individuals. His point of view is very close to the idea of K. Jung about the "collective unconscious" with its inherent "archetypes," that is, the unconscious patterns of thinking prevailing in society (Appendix K). Jung related their origin to the common memory of a species, tribe, family or group. And this memory is very ancient and is transmitted through the mechanism of heredity. Sheldrake also speaks of the memory of society not in the figurative, but in the literal sense of the word. The collective unconscious presents the present memory of the community, and not just the ancient one.
Note: Considering that it has long been believed that animals of the same species possess a collective soul, their correspondence aid in the course of training will not seem so surprising. Surprisingly, the fact that confirmatory experiments forced themselves to wait so long.
The dissemination of this data to people seems somewhat premature. The fact is that if a person is in a fallen state voluntarily, then the animals are forced, they are "cursed for a man." Therefore, our and their relationship with the original microcosmos are organized in different ways. In particular, there is no single collective soul for all people. For a person, the karmic experience of his microcosm is decisive, and not a hypothetical species memory. This question will be discussed in the next section.
Unlike K. Young, the Concept does not connect the origin of "archetypes" exclusively with long-past times. As will be demonstrated in the next section, "unconscious patterns of thinking" are translated into people by the living archons, that is, by multidimensional creatures created by people themselves and parasitizing on them.
Note: Morphogenetic fields are mentioned above all in connection with the problem of the emergence and development of biological life. Thus, Yu. Chaikovsky suggests that "the biofield probably was born in the course of abiogenesis, formed its" resonators ", which became carriers of heredity, and determined the further course of the entire evolution." His position is clear, he sees the source of the morphogenetic field only in the environment where life has arisen. Sheldrake believes that the source of the field can be anywhere in the universe. But they agree that this field basically performs the role of collective memory, although collectives can consist of both galaxies, animals, or atoms.
In any case, memory is a conservative beginning. She describes what happened. Meanwhile, evolution demonstrates many examples of preadaptation, it prepares the creatures for the future at an accelerated pace. This effect can not be explained by any memory. In the theory of R. Sheldrake it is not at all clear how something new is emerging in the world. How, for example, did such a complex genome appear here, that almost the entire evolution is a search of its ready blocks?
The concept proceeds from the Gnostic tradition that the biological life in our three-dimensional space has arisen only to enable people to return to their original world. At the same time, many ready-made "devices and methods" are used in the Universe long before the seven-dimensional level was mastered. Thus, all biological evolution is a process that is not accidental, but directed. Behind him is not chaos, but mighty Will. Trying to unravel the subtle nuances of Her design is no less fascinating for research than traditional science, proceeding from the hypothesis of chance.
In 1981 the book of R. Sheldrake was published, in which he put forward a hypothesis about morphic (form-building) fields. The reaction to the book turned out to be polar and very stormy, which contributed to its popularity. From that moment the idea that organisms of all beings acquire their complex anatomical structure not under the influence of only DNA, but also of an external agent carrying the memory of a biological species, has been widely circulated in society.
The idea of the role of fields in the formation of the embryo was expressed by A. Gurvich much earlier, back in 1920, but remained the lot of a narrow circle of specialists. Gurvich called this field morphogenetic, since it acted in the process of genesis. R. Sheldrake boldly extended the idea of a form-forming field to virtually all natural phenomena, and therefore suggested calling it morphic.
In addition to writing several books on the development of this subject, R. Sheldrake actively conducts his website on the Internet at www.sheldrake.org , where you can see the current state of his theory.
One of the important starting points of the worldview of R. Sheldrake is the idea of consciousness, even the consciousness of everything. He is convinced that the cosmos is filled with life in the sense that they are alive and endowed with the consciousness of the planet, planetary systems, galaxies and galactic clusters. Along with the rest, our planet Earth is also Gaia. The concept fully in this with him is solidary, with the proviso that the listed astronomical objects are only three-dimensional "skeletons" of conscious multi-dimensional beings.
Therefore, it is not surprising that the still popular cosmological model of the Big Bang is interpreted in the spirit of Eastern philosophy. Exactly: The universe was born from the revealed cosmic egg and is now growing. Thus, it should be looked at as a developing embryo rather than as a mechanical device.
The principle of development he extends to the laws of nature, governing the universe. And in fact, how can one talk about the immutable laws of nature applied to those times when no universe was yet? After all, the Big Bang theory proclaims that space and time arose together with the universe. Before its appearance there was no time, so there was no causality necessary for the existence of laws. To think otherwise would be equivalent to allowing the existence of eternal, unchanging Platonic ideas, whose shadows our world is supposed to be.
As is known, many scientists are inclined to "solve" the problem of the "anthropic principle" of the problem of an unlikely combination of the values of physical constants that admit the existence of biological life. They believe that for a mysterious reason, a lot of universes with different sets of constants (and, apparently, with different laws of nature) are constantly being born from the vacuum. Life originated in the rarest of them. So we see it.
To this approach, which is equivalent to the "cognitive impasse," according to the words of Tchaikovsky, R. Sheldrake opposes the idea that the laws of physics (like biology) are the result of the evolution of the universe. He proposes to abandon the term "law of nature" and replace it with the term "habit".
In support of this position, he cites data that even such a primitive process as the growth of crystals demonstrates the effects of "addiction." Thus, the formation of crystals of new, previously unknown chemicals, is happening the more successfully and the faster, the more often such experiments are repeated, which can not be explained from the point of view of official science. For substances that exist for billions of years, there is no variation in the rate of crystallization. Apparently, these chemical reactions have been repeated so many times that the "habit" of them has become similar to the law.
Note: R. Sheldrake's assumption that the whole universe is imbued with life and consciousness is very close to the Concept. However, it confines itself to considering only the three-dimensional "section" of the entire Universe, and by it only the physical universe is understood. But we, the inhabitants of the three-dimensional world, were here as a result of the Fall. By origin we are seven-dimensional. Here only three-dimensional "skeletons" of multidimensional beings are available for observation. Therefore, the physical planet Earth is the visible "skeleton" of the five-dimensional living being, which, indeed, is appropriate to call Gaia.
In the Universe, the process of formation of the Macrocosmos of new dimensions is carried out. The next step along this path takes place not earlier than in the previous Macrocosm, the state of Harmony will be achieved. It is inherited by the new Macrocosmos, but covers objects of only old dimensions. For the space of the new dimension and its beings, "pre-established harmony" is equivalent to the laws of nature
Therefore, the idea of R. Sheldrake that the laws of nature are essentially the result of her "habit" and are formed in the process of evolution, is absolutely correct.
So, the Universe is like a living organism, and what seems to be its laws is associated with stable patterns of behavior of the creatures inhabiting it. This applies even to mechanical processes. All nature is structured by fields, they bind and order the energy of the world. In addition to the known force fields, gravitational, etc., R. Sheldrake proposes to consider the form-forming fields, which he called morphic. He believes that they are as universal as the known physical fields. They are responsible for the uniformity of cosmic evolution, since all objects of one type are interconnected by fields and affect each other through morphic resonance. Such a resonance acts between similar objects regardless of distances and remoteness in time. "A universal network of morphic resonance among galaxies, stars and atoms is possible" ...
R. Sheldrake believes that the morphic fields have a kind of internal memory. They develop over time, because they themselves depend on the prehistory of the development of the form that is determined. This explains, in particular, the species stability of biological creatures, including humans.
He believes that when all form questions are linked to DNA, in which the genetic program of the organism, including its form, is supposed to be contained, then what is not attributed to DNA is attributed to it. It only controls the synthesis of proteins and nothing else! DNA is the same in all cells of the body. And the proteins are also the same. How then can DNA affect the shape of the body? After all, the house plan can not be contained in its bricks. So, DNA plays the role of just a resonator that connects the process of embryo development to that field that corresponds to this species. At the same time, the morphogenetic fields themselves are not inherited, they manifest themselves directly through morphic resonance.
An important argument in favor of this theory is the ability of organisms to heal their wounds. Moreover, with proper care, a part of the tree (seedling) grows into a whole tree. Parts of the worm grow into new worms.
Thus, the heredity of beings depends not only on genes. Genes define a set of proteins in the body, while the morphic fields determine the mutual organization of these proteins, the anatomy and behavior of the organism. Therefore, it should not be surprising that the human genome is not much different from the genome of the earthworm, which consists of similar proteins.
A growing organism is formed by a field that permeates it inside and surrounds it from the outside. It seems to contain the form of the organism. According to R. Sheldrake, this scheme is very close to the teachings of Aristotle about the soul, which is in all living things and sets the shape of the body. The body is contained in the soul, and not vice versa!
Note: As you can see, R.Shldrejka's theory is a list of properties that some desired object must satisfy to explain a large number of incomprehensible phenomena. The very term "field" helps him to keep within the accepted scientific paradigm, although on its very edge. All those properties of the morphic fields, which Sheldrake formulates, are easily found in thin microorganisms. The fact that the physical bodies of beings are surrounded by a glowing thin-material cocoon is unquestionable.
The effect of morphic fields outside time and space is explained by the fact that these fields are another name for the interaction of thin material structures with each other. Their space is primary in relation to the physical, and therefore their influence is carried out outside the framework of our space-time, and, as it were, without the expenditure of energy.
For the Concept, it is very important that Sheldrake's argument that in the process of ontogeny, DNA molecules play the role of only resonators that attract the carriers of the shaping impulse. The very DNA of information about the form and behavior of the future organism does not. The fertilized egg is the very same vacancy for the embodiment described in the Concept. But this is only her physical body. The main part of the vacancy is its thin material body, built of luminous fibers taken from the cocoons of the parents. This question is discussed in more detail in the next section.
R. Sheldrake believes that human memory is not stored inside the brain, as is commonly believed. Her organization has nothing to do with computer memory. This difference is especially noticeable due to the fact that the brain is extremely active at all times, day and night. This behavior is completely unrelated to the data warehouse. That should remain in peace until the moment of its replenishment or the appearance of a request to it.
In addition, the idea of a data warehouse is closely related to the problem of data recognition. If there is a request for the memory of something concrete, the memory should already know what is at stake. To do this, the main memory must have a sub memory. But before that there is also the problem of recognition, and so on ad infinitum.
Biologists have long been searching for traces of memory inside the brain, and these searches have not been crowned with success. Especially indicative are the experiments of K. Lashley with the removal of fragments of the brain in rats, trained to perform a certain trick beforehand. So, the rats continued to perform it, regardless of what brain tissue they had been removed from. Lashley himself and his student K. Pribram concluded from this that memory is distributed evenly throughout the brain, like a hologram. Sheldrake criticizes them for being so attached to the brain. In his opinion, traces of memory can not be found inside the brain simply because they are not there. It's like looking at the TV for the tracks of the programs that were viewed yesterday. The brain is more like a TV than a tape recorder. The brain is a device for setting up external morphic memory, and not its storage.
Due to the morphic resonance, such things affect similar things through space and time. The degree of influence depends on the degree of similarity. Since a person changes little, say, in five minutes, then his self-resonance stabilizes the morphic field and helps the body maintain its shape despite the fact that in every cell there is a mass of chemical processes. Similarly, due to self-resonance, habitual stereotypes of behavior are maintained.
Note: R. Sheldrake's idea that the brain is not a place of storage of memory, unfortunately, is not accompanied by an indication of the agent who replaces it in this respect. If we talk about the field seriously, it always plays the role of only a transmission link. It brings information from a source where it must somehow be stored.
The concept also shows that the brain is only the coordinating center of behavior. The world itself is in the memory of the world in its moments of the past . This memory is realized in the form of fine-material spatial structures of the microcosm, usually staying at rest. Their configuration took shape at the moment when a wave of energy passed through this part of the microcosm, with which our psyche connects its sense of "now". The effect of remembering arises when these structures are excited, than the presence of consciousness is modeled in the very moment of the past, which you need to remember.
The idea of morphine resonance is applicable not only to the growth of new crystals or to the development of living organisms, but also to the behavior of large groups of people. On its basis, the vitality and importance of traditions and rituals are easily explained. It helps to explain such phenomena as fashion, mass hypnosis and telepathy. According to Sheldrake, our brain is not only a "receiver", but also a "transmitter" of information, which remains in a kind of common pool even after the disappearance of the physical source.
The latter circumstance has found its unexpected confirmation on the example of blue tits, living in Holland. Since the 20-ies of the last century there is a tradition to leave the ordered milk on the porch of the house. So, the little cynics eventually learned to open these milk bottles and glue the cream. Then, in the trade in bottled milk, a seven-year break occurred, connected with the war. But as soon as the tradition was resumed, the tits of the whole Holland were engaged in milder piracy in a year. To appreciate this phenomenon, it should be noted that these birds live only three years and migrate for only three miles. Therefore, the war for them meant breaking the tradition for two generations at least. What helped them so quickly recover their skills on such a large territory?
At one time, R. Sheldrake predicted that the presence of the morphic field should facilitate the training of certain types of animals for animals of some kind, if a group of such animals has already mastered this skill. This effect must exist in addition to physical contacts between populations.
Sheldrake analyzed the old series of experiments on the training of rats, conducted in the 50's. The experiments began at Harvard, then continued in Scotland and in Australia. The accelerated learning of the rats found by him reached ten times! That is, the measured effect far exceeded the level of possible errors.
A natural continuation of what has been said is R. Sheldrake's assumption that there is a collective memory underlying everything we do and everything that we remember as individuals. His point of view is very close to the idea of K. Jung about the "collective unconscious" with its inherent "archetypes," that is, the unconscious patterns of thinking prevailing in society (Appendix K). Jung related their origin to the common memory of a species, tribe, family or group. And this memory is very ancient and is transmitted through the mechanism of heredity. Sheldrake also speaks of the memory of society not in the figurative, but in the literal sense of the word. The collective unconscious presents the present memory of the community, and not just the ancient one.
Note: Considering that it has long been believed that animals of the same species possess a collective soul, their correspondence aid in the course of training will not seem so surprising. Surprisingly, the fact that confirmatory experiments forced themselves to wait so long.
The dissemination of this data to people seems somewhat premature. The fact is that if a person is in a fallen state voluntarily, then the animals are forced, they are "cursed for a man." Therefore, our and their relationship with the original microcosmos are organized in different ways. In particular, there is no single collective soul for all people. For a person, the karmic experience of his microcosm is decisive, and not a hypothetical species memory. This question will be discussed in the next section.
Unlike K. Young, the Concept does not connect the origin of "archetypes" exclusively with long-past times. As will be demonstrated in the next section, "unconscious patterns of thinking" are translated into people by the living archons, that is, by multidimensional creatures created by people themselves and parasitizing on them.
Note: Morphogenetic fields are mentioned above all in connection with the problem of the emergence and development of biological life. Thus, Yu. Chaikovsky suggests that "the biofield probably was born in the course of abiogenesis, formed its" resonators ", which became carriers of heredity, and determined the further course of the entire evolution." His position is clear, he sees the source of the morphogenetic field only in the environment where life has arisen. Sheldrake believes that the source of the field can be anywhere in the universe. But they agree that this field basically performs the role of collective memory, although collectives can consist of both galaxies, animals, or atoms.
In any case, memory is a conservative beginning. She describes what happened. Meanwhile, evolution demonstrates many examples of preadaptation, it prepares the creatures for the future at an accelerated pace. This effect can not be explained by any memory. In the theory of R. Sheldrake it is not at all clear how something new is emerging in the world. How, for example, did such a complex genome appear here, that almost the entire evolution is a search of its ready blocks?
The concept proceeds from the Gnostic tradition that the biological life in our three-dimensional space has arisen only to enable people to return to their original world. At the same time, many ready-made "devices and methods" are used in the Universe long before the seven-dimensional level was mastered. Thus, all biological evolution is a process that is not accidental, but directed. Behind him is not chaos, but mighty Will. Trying to unravel the subtle nuances of Her design is no less fascinating for research than traditional science, proceeding from the hypothesis of chance.
Note: Sorry i have not any picture for this topic
Post a Comment